Four years after the LastPass breach, Russian hackers are still draining cryptocurrency wallets from stolen data—while 1Password users avoided this nightmare entirely. The $24.5 million settlement tells part of the story, but the architectural difference that explains why is even more revealing.
Key Takeaways
- 1Password’s Secret Key architecture makes it practically infeasible for hackers to crack stolen vaults, while LastPass remains vulnerable to offline attacks despite security improvements
- The $24.5 million LastPass settlement and ongoing cryptocurrency thefts show the lasting impact of single-factor password protection systems
- Russian cybercriminals are still draining crypto wallets from the 2022 LastPass breach, while 1Password users avoided this nightmare entirely
- For security-conscious users, 1Password wins on protection while LastPass offers superior administrative control for businesses
- Both platforms now support passkeys, but 1Password’s multi-device sharing capabilities and Travel Mode provide distinctive security advantages
The password management landscape changed forever when LastPass suffered its catastrophic 2022 breach. Four years later, the aftermath continues to shape which platform security-conscious users can trust with their digital lives. While both companies offer zero-knowledge architecture, their approaches to protecting user data reveal stark differences in real-world security outcomes.
The $24.5 Million Settlement That Changed Password Management
The financial reckoning for LastPass reached its peak in February 2026 when the company received court approval for a $24.5 million class-action settlement. This massive payout—split between $16.3 million for broader class compensation and $8.2 million for documented losses including cryptocurrency theft—represents more than just monetary damages. It signals a fundamental shift in how password managers are held accountable for security failures.
The settlement followed a devastating regulatory fine from the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office, which slapped LastPass with a £1.2 million penalty in December 2025. The ICO found that LastPass failed to implement “sufficiently robust technical and security measures” during its 2022 breach, affecting up to 1.6 million UK users alone. These aren’t just numbers on paper—they represent real people whose financial security remains compromised years after the initial attack.
What makes this situation particularly alarming is the ongoing nature of the threat. Unlike typical data breaches where immediate action can contain the damage, the LastPass breach created a lasting vulnerability. Security experts continue tracking these breach consequences, noting that weak master passwords remain susceptible to cracking attempts indefinitely.
Security Architecture: Secret Keys vs Master Passwords
The core difference between these platforms lies in their fundamental approach to encryption. While both utilize zero-knowledge architecture—meaning neither company can access your passwords—their methods of protecting that data vary dramatically in effectiveness against real-world attacks.
Not sure whether to switch password managers? The comparison below breaks down exactly where LastPass and 1Password stand in 2026 — across security, features, pricing, and the hard lessons from the 2022 breach. Use the interactive tool to find the best fit for your situation.
🔐 LastPass vs 1Password: Which Is Right for You?
Select your priority to see a tailored comparison
As the comparison above shows, the “right” password manager depends on your threat model. For most individuals and small teams, 1Password’s architectural security advantage — especially in the wake of the LastPass breach — makes it the safer default. Read the full breakdown below for the technical details behind each verdict.
1Password’s Dual-Layer Protection Model
1Password distinguishes itself through its Secret Key system, a cryptographically strong identifier generated locally on each user’s device during setup. This key never leaves the device or gets transmitted to company servers. When combined with the master password, it creates a dual-factor system that makes offline brute-force attacks practically infeasible.
The technical implications are profound. Even if hackers steal encrypted 1Password vaults, they would need both the master password and the device-specific Secret Key to decrypt the data. With substantial entropy from the Secret Key alone, current computational power—and even projected quantum computing advances—cannot break this protection through brute force. This architectural advantage explains why 1Password users completely avoided the cryptocurrency theft problems plaguing LastPass users.
LastPass’s 600,000-Round Recovery Strategy
LastPass relies on a traditional single-factor approach, using only the master password for key derivation. Following the 2022 breach, the company dramatically increased its PBKDF2 iteration count to 600,000 rounds for all accounts. This computational requirement makes password cracking significantly more expensive and time-consuming for attackers.
However, this improvement only slows down attacks rather than preventing them entirely. Users with weak master passwords remain vulnerable to determined attackers with sufficient computational resources. The 600,000 iterations represent a major security enhancement, but they cannot match the mathematical certainty provided by 1Password’s dual-layer architecture.
The Ongoing Crypto Theft Problem
The most damaging consequence of the LastPass breach continues to unfold in 2026, with cryptocurrency holders facing ongoing theft attempts. The breach’s impact extends far beyond the initial data theft, creating a permanent vulnerability for users who haven’t migrated to more secure platforms.
TRM Labs Findings: Russian Hackers Still Draining Wallets
Blockchain analysis firm TRM Labs reported in late 2025 that Russian cybercriminal groups are still successfully accessing cryptocurrency wallets using data traced directly to the 2022 LastPass breach. These attacks exploit the fundamental weakness of single-factor encryption: given enough time and computational resources, weak master passwords can be cracked.
The stolen LastPass vaults contained both encrypted password data and unencrypted metadata, including website URLs and account information. This combination allows attackers to identify high-value targets—users with cryptocurrency exchange accounts or wallet software—and focus their cracking efforts accordingly. Once they break a weak master password, attackers gain access to every stored credential in that vault.
Why 1Password Users Avoided This Nightmare
1Password users faced no similar cryptocurrency theft campaigns because their Secret Key architecture makes offline vault cracking extremely difficult. Even users with relatively weak master passwords remain protected by the device-specific key that attackers cannot obtain from stolen server data.
This real-world protection difference highlights why security-conscious cryptocurrency holders have largely migrated away from LastPass. The mathematical certainty of 1Password’s protection model provides peace of mind that single-factor systems cannot match, regardless of iteration count improvements.
Trust Center vs Transparency Crisis
The two companies have taken markedly different approaches to rebuilding user trust following the industry’s security challenges. Their transparency practices and security track records reveal important differences in corporate accountability and user protection.
1Password’s Unblemished Security Record
1Password maintains an unprecedented record in the password management industry: no publicly disclosed breaches involving customer vault data. The company operates a Trust Center providing access to annual SOC 2 Type 2 reports, third-party penetration test results, and detailed security certifications including ISO 27001.
The company’s confidence in its security architecture is demonstrated through its expanded bug bounty program, which offers substantial rewards for critical vulnerability discoveries. This proactive approach signals both technical confidence and commitment to continuous security improvement. Regular independent security audits and integration with multiple SIEM platforms demonstrate enterprise-grade transparency.
LastPass’s Regulatory Fines and Court Battles
LastPass faced a series of regulatory actions and legal challenges that extended well beyond the initial 2022 breach. The UK’s ICO fine of £1.2 million specifically cited inadequate technical and organizational security measures, while the $24.5 million class-action settlement acknowledged documented user losses including cryptocurrency theft.
These regulatory actions reflect more than financial penalties—they represent official findings that LastPass’s security practices fell short of reasonable standards. The company’s response included a thorough security overhaul under CEO Karim Toubba, implementing mandatory hardware security keys for all employees and stricter network segmentation. However, these improvements came after user data was already compromised.
Security Audits: Public Reports vs Post-Breach Promises
Both companies now undergo continuous third-party security audits, but their historical transparency differs significantly. 1Password’s Trust Center provides ongoing access to security reports and certifications, while LastPass’s security documentation focuses primarily on post-2022 improvements and compliance certifications.
The key difference lies in proactive versus reactive transparency. 1Password built its reputation on consistent security practices and open reporting, while LastPass is rebuilding trust after a major failure. For security-conscious users, this historical context matters when evaluating long-term platform reliability.
2026 Feature Battle: Passkeys and Beyond
Both platforms have fully integrated support for passkeys and FIDO2 standards, but their implementations reveal different philosophies about user convenience and security integration.
Multi-Device Passkey Sharing vs Centralized Storage
1Password leads passkey implementation with its multi-device credential system. Users can create passkeys on one device and immediately use them across all platforms—from mobile creation to desktop usage via browser extensions. The platform also allows passkey sharing through shared vaults, making it ideal for teams and families managing common accounts.
LastPass provides full passkey storage and synchronization but requires recipients to join the LastPass ecosystem for shared access. While this approach ensures security, it creates friction for temporary sharing or collaboration with non-LastPass users. The platform’s Adaptive Authentication uses risk-based contextual analysis to secure logins, but lacks the seamless cross-platform flexibility of 1Password’s implementation.
Travel Mode: A Distinctive Security Feature
1Password’s Travel Mode remains a leading feature in the industry, temporarily removing selected vaults from local devices with a single click. When enabled, sensitive data becomes physically absent from the device—vital protection against border searches, device theft, or forensic extraction in high-risk environments.
LastPass offers geographic access restrictions but cannot remove encrypted data from local storage. This fundamental difference makes 1Password the preferred choice for users who travel frequently or work in sensitive environments where device searches pose legitimate security risks.
Pricing Reality Check for Security-Conscious Users
The pricing landscape reflects each company’s market positioning and target audience priorities. While base costs appear similar, the inclusion of specific features and security capabilities creates meaningful value differences.
Free Tier Restrictions vs Premium Security
LastPass offers a free tier, though with significant limitations. Free users can access passwords on either mobile or desktop devices, but not both simultaneously. This restriction forces most modern users toward the $3.00 monthly Premium tier for cross-device synchronization.
1Password eliminates the free tier entirely, relying on a 14-day trial to demonstrate value before requiring the $2.99 monthly Individual subscription. For users willing to pay for password management, the one-cent monthly difference becomes negligible, shifting focus to security architecture and feature sets rather than price comparison.
Family and Business Value Analysis
Family planning reveals more significant pricing differences. LastPass Families covers six users for $4.00 monthly, while 1Password Families covers five users for $4.99 monthly. However, 1Password’s superior Emergency Kit and account recovery features often justify the premium for security-conscious families.
Small business pricing shows 1Password’s aggressive positioning. The Teams Starter Pack provides coverage for up to 10 users at a flat $19.95 monthly rate—dramatically undercutting LastPass Business at $7.00 per user monthly. For a 10-person team, this creates an annual cost difference of $600, making 1Password the clear value leader for small organizations prioritizing both security and budget considerations.
1Password Wins on Security, LastPass Offers Administrative Control
The choice between these platforms ultimately depends on whether users prioritize mathematical security certainty or administrative flexibility. 1Password’s Secret Key architecture provides unmatched protection against offline attacks, making it the clear choice for security-conscious individuals, families, and small businesses. The platform’s unblemished security record, Travel Mode, and superior passkey implementation create a compelling package for users who view security as non-negotiable.
LastPass remains competitive for large organizations requiring extensive policy granularity and administrative control. With over 100 customizable security policies and deep SIEM integration capabilities, it serves enterprise environments where compliance requirements and user management complexity outweigh individual security concerns. The platform’s post-2022 security overhaul has addressed many architectural weaknesses, though the fundamental single-factor encryption model cannot match 1Password’s mathematical protection.
For individual users and families, 1Password’s combination of superior security architecture, clean track record, and competitive pricing makes it the recommended choice in 2026. The ongoing cryptocurrency thefts from the LastPass breach serve as a stark reminder that password security isn’t just about convenience—it’s about protecting financial assets and personal data from determined attackers with time and resources to crack weak protections.
Discover more cybersecurity insights and tools from the security experts at TechEd Publishers, where complex security concepts are translated into clear, actionable guidance for everyday users.